nationbooksprojectofnation

posted April 15, 2003 11:27 am

Books in flames

 (Click to E-mail this Tomgram, or post to Facebook, Digg, Reddit and many others)

In the 13th century, the Arab world had what was undoubtedly the greatest system of public libraries on earth, most open to rich and poor alike. "When the geographer Yakur al-Himawi visited the …city of Merv in 1228," Fred Lerner tells us in his book The Story of Libraries, "he found there ten libraries open to the public. From one of these, the Damiriyah library, he was able to borrow more than two hundred books at a time." In such libraries, you might be given paper and ink to make notes on the text you requested, though if you planned to copy a text yourself (in those days before printing), you had to bring the necessary materials with you. The loaning out of texts -- considered a religious obligation to facilitate the spread of knowledge -- was typically done on the basis of one day for each leaf of text. "This was considered ample time for the borrower to copy the entire book."

As Lerner tells us, "When the Mongols swept across the Muslim lands in the 13th century, they destroyed the great cities of central Asia and, in 1258, Baghdad itself. In one week most of that city's thirty-six public libraries were destroyed. Al-Nadim's Fihrist al'ulum (Index of the Sciences) lists the books known to a 10th-century Baghdad scholar; fewer than one in a thousand survives today because of the Mongol raids. Illuminated manuscripts and exquisite examples of calligraphy were burned as fuel, while finely decorated leather bindings went to shoe Mongol feet. Scholars and students were massacred, and the Mongol hordes rode westward across Syria until they were stopped in Egypt."

Almost 750 years later -- with the National Museum of Antiquities looted and trashed, with those tablets on which Hammurabi first had a code of laws inscribed simply gone, as may be cuneiform tablets with missing pieces of the Gilgamesh epic -- the great National Library of Baghdad is again burning, and tens of thousands of manuscripts, and who knows what else, are lost, as a piece by Oliver Burkeman of the Guardian indicates. The Pentagon admits to confusion but denies responsibility, despite the fact that the Washington Post has now reported in some detail on the efforts of scholars, museum directors, archaeologists to warn the government of exactly this before the war; all of it, it seems, completely predictable - for those whose minds weren't on other matters.

It turns out, however, that there was another group that may have had the ear of this privatizing administration of ours. As Burkeman reports,

"…a letter from nine British archaeologists, published in the Guardian yesterday, [claimed] that private collectors were 'persuading the Pentagon to relax legislation that protects Iraq's heritage by prevention of sales abroad'.

"The American Council for Cultural Policy, a New York-based coalition of about 60 collectors, dealers and others, had received 'no special treatment,' the official insisted, despite reports that members of the group met with Bush administration representatives in January to argue that a post-Saddam Iraq should have relaxed antiquities laws."

Undoubtedly, a contest between private collectors and public museums (and scholars) for the ear of this administration would have been like the contest between energy companies and environmentalists for Dick Cheney's ear in another slash-and-burn moment of administration history. It seems that in the spirit of liberating Iraq by privatizing it, plans were indeed being laid for the "patrimony" of Iraq to come home - to well-endowed private homes elsewhere on this homeland planet of ours.

The question of whether we are the new Mongols remains, of course, to be answered, though Wayne Marsden at least proposes it at www.counterpunch.com in a piece, Was Saddam right? Are American the new Mongols of the Mideast?. He writes: "The United States and Britain… are among the few nations of the world to have refused signing The Hague Convention on the protection of cultural heritage during hostilities." We, who now grasp the right to define alone how the world should work, are not the ones to be entrusted with the answer to this question.

I include as well LA Times columnist Robert Scheer's latest on the "untidiness" of American policy in Iraq and a piece by Matthew Engel of the Guardian, who visits a sacred American historical site, Gettysburg, and suggests just how far this warrior nation of ours is from any but the most entertaining dreams of a warring world. Tom

Ancient archive lost in Baghdad library blaze

Oliver Burkeman
The Guardian
April 15, 2003

As flames engulfed Baghdad's National Library yesterday, destroying manuscripts many centuries old, the Pentagon admitted that it had been caught unprepared by the widespread looting of antiquities, despite months of warnings from American archaeologists.

But defence department officials denied accusations by British archaeologists that the US government was succumbing to pressure from private collectors in America to allow plundered Iraqi treasures to be traded on the open market.

Almost nothing remains of the library's archive of tens of thousands of manuscripts, books, and Iraqi newspapers, according to reports from the scene.

It joins a list that already includes the capital's National Museum, one of the world's most important troves of artefacts from the ancient Sumerian, Babylonian and Assyrian civilisations.

To read more Burkeman click here

Pentagon Was Told Of Risk to Museums

U.S. Urged to Save Iraq's Historic Artifacts
By Guy Gugliotta
Washington Post
April 14, 2003

In the months leading up to the Iraq war, U.S. scholars repeatedly urged the Defense Department to protect Iraq's priceless archaeological heritage from looters, and warned specifically that the National Museum of Antiquities was the single most important site in the country.

Late in January, a mix of scholars, museum directors, art collectors and antiquities dealers asked for and were granted a meeting at the Pentagon to discuss their misgivings. McGuire Gibson, an Iraq specialist at the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute, said yesterday that he went back twice more, and he and colleagues peppered Defense Department officials with e-mail reminders in the weeks before the war began.

"I thought I was given assurances that sites and museums would be protected," Gibson said.

To read more Washington Post click here

It's U.S. Policy That's 'Untidy'

By Robert Scheer
Los Angeles Times
April 15, 2003

How telling that U.S. forces so carefully protected Iraq's oil fields while ignoring the looting of Baghdad's internationally renowned museum. The complete, and by all accounts preventable, destruction of one of the world's most significant collections of antiquities is a fit metaphor for current U.S. foreign policy, which causes more serious damage through carelessness than calculation.

The notion that Iraq even has history -- let alone that 7,000 years ago this land was the cradle of civilization -- is not likely to occur to the neocolonialists running a brawny young nation barely more than 200 years old. The United States' earnest innocence is the charm that our entertainment industry markets so successfully around the world, but it is also the perennial seed of disaster as we blithely rearrange corners of the planet we only pretend to understand.

To read more Scheer click here

The thrill of battle

By Matthew Engel
The Guardian
April 15, 2003

Anyone who thinks war never does anyone any good has obviously never been to Gettysburg. It has made a fortune for an otherwise unremarkable southern Pennsylvanian town. There are dozens of other civil war battlefields, offering discreet tourism for the discerning and the obsessed, but Gettysburg is in a different league.

This is mainly due to the uniquely bloody (nearly 7,000 dead) and decisive nature of the encounter: once the Confederate general, George Pickett, had indulged the fashion, set by the British at Balaclava, for pointless uphill charges, the south's cause - though the end was nearly two years away - was essentially doomed. So now, even on the most dismal winter weekday, the town is full of school buses and camper vans; you can stay at the Battlefield Inn or the Drummer Boy campground, go on the Ghosts of Gettysburg tour, and eat heartily afterwards at General Pickett's All-U-Can-Eat Buffet restaurant.

To read more Engel click here

Printer-Friendly Version

book

The World According to TomDispatch

For many of us, these are the key pieces of analysis that made sense of our post-9/11 world.
- Naomi Klein

The publication of this splendid collection of dispatches is cause for celebration.
- Andrew Bacevich

Click to read about this book, reviews and blurbs, or to buy.

book

Republican Gomorrah

Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party

By Max Blumenthal

Republican Gomorrah is award-winning journalist Max Blumenthal's remarkable, muckraking debut. An "irresistible combination of anthropology and psychopathology," it is at once shocking, edifying and hilarious. Blumenthal describes the people and the beliefs that establishment Republicans—like John McCain and Sarah Palin—have to kowtow to if they have any hope of running for president, and how moderates have been systematically purged from party ranks.

Click here to see details of his book tour. Blumenthal's book is #15 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Nation Books

TomDispatch Video

Chalmers Johnson
Nick Turse
Howard Zinn
Mike Klare
Ann Jones
Tom Engelhardt
Rick Shenkman
Andrew Bacevich

Websites

After Downing Street
Alternet
Antiwar.com
Atlantic Free Press
Black Agenda Report
Buzzflash
Commondreams
Cursor.org
Electronic Iraq
Fabius Maximus
Foreign Policy in Focus
History News Network
Iraq Slogger
Juan Cole's Informed Comment
Lew Rockwell
Open Democracy
PEJ
The Smirking Chimp
Talking Points Memo
TomPaine
TPM Muckraker
Truthdig
Truthout
War in Context
Working for Change
ZNET

Blogs

The American Empire Project
Barbara's Blog
Democrats.com
Dahr Jamail's MidEast Dispatches
Dan Froomkin's White House Watch
Direland
The Dreyfuss Report
Econowhiner
Eric Alterman's Altercation
Firedoglake
Gristmill Blog
Inter Press Service
Lobelog
The Notion at the Nation
Scott Horton's No Comment
This Modern World
A Tiny Revolution
Tony Karon's Rootless Cosmopolitan
The Utne Reader
William Arkin's Early Warning

Foreign

AlArab Online
Agence France Presse
Asia Times
BBC
Foreign Press Review
The Guardian
Haaretz
The Independent
Middle East On-Line
LeMonde Diplomatique
Le Monde Diplomatique (English Language)
Outlook India
Watching America

Magazines

American Prospect
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
Grist
Guernica
LA Weekly
The London Review of Books
Mother Jones
The Nation
The New York Review of Books
Salon.com

Media Criticism

Editor and Publisher
The E&P Pub
FAIR
Media Bloodhound
Media Matters
The News Dissector
Neiman Watchdog
PressThink
Romenesko

Resources

Arms Trade Resource Center
Defense Tech
Global Security.org
Jim Lobe's Interpress Archive
The National Security Archives
Natural Resources Defense Council
Noah Schachtman's Danger Room
Right Web
Secrecy News
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
Wikipedia

Comics

Doonesbury
Life During Wartime
Tom Tomorrow's This Modern World

Polling

Donkey Rising
Pollster.com
ProfessorPollkatz's Pool of Polls
Program on International Policy Attitudes
Real Clear Politics
Zogby

Iraq Casualty Figures

Antiwar.com Casualties Page
Antiwar.com Daily Casualty Update
Iraq Body Count
Iraq Coalition Casualties

Mainstream Media

Christian Science Monitor
Los Angeles Times
Newsweek
New York Times
Washington Post


Tom Engelhardt's articles from around the web


Why the US Military Loves Ron Paul
July 23, 2007, The Nation website

Order 17
September 24, 2007, The Nation website

We Count, They Don't
October 4, 2007, The Nation website

Medal Inflation
October 9, 2007, The Nation website

Tom's Review of Books
December 11, 2007, TomDispatch..