nationbooksprojectofnation

posted November 05, 2003 6:55 pm

Guestdispatch update: Virtual military adventure

For those of you in search of adventure in distant lands, the U.S. Army wants you, or at least your video-game skills. Thanks to the latest military venture in adapting entertainment technology, you'll soon be able to join up, travel to distant lands (think Afghanistan, Kuwait, Iraq), see the world, and defend an American embassy without ever leaving someone's couch. Some weeks back, Nick Turse wrote Bringing the War Home: The New Military-Industrial-Entertainment Complex at War and Play for this blog. It dealt with the ever tightening web of Web connections between the American worlds of entertainment and destruction. He offers an update below -- the latest virtual developments in the creation of a well-trained couch-potato army. Tom

The Military-Industrial-Entertainment Complex Takes Training Over "There"

By Nick Turse

Over there, over there,
Send the word, send the word, over there --
That the (virtual-militarized-avatar-) Yanks are coming,
The (virtual-militarized-avatar-) Yanks are coming,
The (digital) drums rum-tumming
(virtually) Ev'rywhere.
So prepare, say a pray'r,
Send the word, send the word to beware.
We'll be over, we're coming over,
And we won't come back till it's over
Over there.

-- "Over There" (1917), a popular patriotic song penned by George M. Cohan celebrating U.S. entry into World War I (which earned Cohan a medal from Congress) -- with updates (2003) by Nick Turse (who expects no such medal for his efforts).

In the last week of October, There, Inc, a Silicon Valley start-up, launched a new subscription-based on-line game, "There" (www.there.com/index.html) -- as in not Here but Elsewhere. Billed as a "getaway" ("game" is a verboten term in There's new world of on-line experiences), it is actually similar to other online role-playing games like Electronic Art's "Sims On-line" and Sony's "EverQuest," but, say its creators, it will let gamers create far more realistic and expressive virtual personas than those of other games. Using digital characters capable of subtle human-like gestures, such as making eye contact, sighing and blinking, There looks to further blur the line between real and virtual worlds. Its promise is a virtual world where individuals can engage in a wide variety of (PG-13 only) activities, including designing homes and clothes, going to parties, traveling around the game's virtual environment on "hover boards" and dune buggies and listening to music.

Perhaps the most important passion There promotes is shopping. Its makers have created a whole on-line shared world where you can actually spend perfectly real dollars. Players can put down hard-earned real world money to purchase "Therebucks," game money for virtual shopping and then enter There-world where it will be possible for a price (thanks to marketing agreements with Nike and Levi's) to cloth one's persona, known as an "avatar," in brand-name virtual basketball sneakers and jeans. Players can also spend real money to entertain their avatars and provide them with tickets to virtual events, customized vehicles and digital houses. Due to a partnership with iVillage Inc., a female-focused media company, a special zone (aimed specifically at women) within the There world will allow avatars to access iVillage services, including astrological and love-compatibility reports.

Players who beta-tested the game shelled out, on average, $7 per month in real money to outfit their avatars, but some spent over $1000 to become virtual fat-cats; and one even created the "Bank of There," letting real people change Therebucks back into actual American dollars. There, Inc. is banking on revenue from monthly fees and yearly subscriptions, as well as the purchase of Therebucks. But the company has another revenue stream -- and it happens to be the U.S. Army.

In June 2003, There, Inc. signed a $3.5-million, multiyear contract with the Army to create a There-like virtual environment for warfare-simulation training (one that the avatars of consumption in their other universe won't be able to make their way into -- not yet anyway). Basically, the company's designers are building "life-like" milieus, depicting various regions of the world -- imagine a virtual Afghanistan -- where young American soldiers, already well-prepared avatars of an on-line lifestyle, can train against unpredictable opponents like virtual terrorists possessing complex organizational and personal strengths and weaknesses, while employing novel weapons and strategies.

One project already underway is the creation of a virtual Kuwait that can be used to train personnel to anticipate and defend against an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait City. According to James Grosse, a principal investigator for the Army's Simulation Technology Center in Orlando, Florida, There Inc.'s application will allow greater participation by larger numbers of players than other simulation environments developed either in the military or commercial worlds. That's saying a lot considering how many video games and simulators the U.S. military is involved with. (For more see: Bringing the War Home: The New Military-Industrial-Entertainment Complex at War and Play.)

Andy Donkin, the chief marketing officer of There, Inc., questioned about his company's military dealings by Gamespot magazine, was asked, "Does politics play in role in your business plan, or is all business good business?" He answered:

Remember, There was started almost six years ago in what now seems like a very different world. Terrorist attacks were not part of the US mindset. However, the founders built There around some key ideas, and it's those ideas that have put us together with the military. Ideas like: real-world physics, subtle detail of in-world conversations and body language, and the concept of There as a planet the size and shape of the earth. I don't think any of this was done with the military in mind. Today, we live in a world where warfare is unconventional and the military needs "real-world" simulations with all of its unpredictability. As we mentioned, because There is a platform, we can separate the consumer business from what we are creating for the military. We were very lucky with the military, and, frankly, our product spoke for itself.

In May 2002, the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Programs Association (DARPA) came calling, was thoroughly impressed by There's technology and the rest, as they say, is history. Like There's creators, who eschew "game" for "getaway," Jack Thorpe, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel who 20 years ago began creating the Pentagon's network of training simulators called Simnet, commented, "I don't see it as a game. I see it as a communication system that's going to allow us to think about our relationships differently." Wow… all this talk of communicating, of relationships, and of a chance encounter between There and DARPA on a moon-lit night… what a romantic scenario. Actually, though, it's surprising that the company wasn't in bed with the military from the start – and you don't even need an iVillage "love-compatibility report" to know why!

There, Inc. has raised some $37 million in venture capital since its inception back in 1998. Its largest single, non-employee-based source of financing appears to be from the venture-capital firm Sutter Hill Ventures. Sutter Hill was formed way back in 1962 with investments from three prime players in the academic wing of the military-industrial complex: Stanford ($37,637,000 in Department of Defense funding for 2000), Princeton ($13,659,000 in 2000) and Yale ($7,000,000 in 2000). Sutter Hill Ventures, by the way, also owns a sizeable share of Virage, Inc. which, in 2001, won the DARPA Tibbetts Award for research and innovation.

There, Inc. itself was co-founded by Jeffrey Ventrella, an expert on artificial life from MIT's Media Lab -- a research center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (aka: "the Pentagon on the Charles") that currently boasts research contracts with the U.S. Air Force, the Department of the Army, and DARPA. Brett G. Durrett, There Inc.'s Vice President of Operations, co-founded and was CEO of Asylum Entertainment which developed video games for THQ -- the company which put out "Full Spectrum Warrior," the civilian version of the Army's "Full Spectrum Command" combat simulator. Talk about the Web -- as in web of relationships. In fact, the There team has ties all across the military-industrial-academic-entertainment complex.

Exactly how the Army will use the militarized virtual worlds of There isn't yet fully known, of course. According to James Grosse, a principal investigator for the Army's Simulation Technology Center in Orlando (interviewed in the San Francisco Chronicle):

It's still unclear how the [There] program will be used… It could be used by students at military universities like West Point, by soldiers out in the field or by intelligence agents… Officials have also discussed using civilian college students -- already versed in online games -- to play roles such as terrorists.

College kids as virtual terrorists? The Army fighting digital battles in virtual worlds using a platform that also allows real-world humans to transform into avatars and spend actual dollars for cyber-shoes? If that doesn't blur the line between the real and the virtual, what does? Who would have thought that there would be only one degree of separation between the women's on-line community of iVillage, which counsels parents that "seeing real human beings killed with the precision and repetition of a video game can have a numbing effect on children" and proclaims "War is not a game" and the U.S. Army?) Moreover, who would believe that the connection between them would be a company willing to transform gaming into shopping and games into war and that imagines teens and young adults (whether at West Point or civilian colleges) as its most likely customers?

It's impossible to know where the military's going with this project, but it sounds like they're already off in left (or is it right?) field, so beware, because they're not likely to come back till it's over, over there.

Nick Turse, a graduate student, devotes much of his time to studying the fall-out of the Vietnam War, especially Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Vietnam veterans for Columbia University's Department of Epidemiology.

E-mail to a Friend | Printer-Friendly Version
signup

Tomdispatch is published 3 to 4 times a week. Sign up today to get it delivered to your e-mail inbox.

book

The World According to TomDispatch

For many of us, these are the key pieces of analysis that made sense of our post-9/11 world.
- Naomi Klein

The publication of this splendid collection of dispatches is cause for celebration.
- Andrew Bacevich

Click to read about this book, reviews and blurbs, or to buy.

book

Hope in the Dark

Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities

By Rebecca Solnit


"Seemingly lost in the woods of deceit and banality, bereft of hope, we are confronted by Rebecca Solnit and her astonishing flashlight. In a jewel of a book that is poetic in substance as well as style, she reveals where we were, where we are and the step-by-step advances that have been made in human rights, as we stubbornly stumble out of the darkness." --Studs Terkel

Nation Books


TomDispatch Video

Chalmers Johnson
Nick Turse
Howard Zinn
Mike Klare
Ann Jones
Tom Engelhardt
Rick Shenkman
Andrew Bacevich

Websites

After Downing Street
Alternet
Antiwar.com
Atlantic Free Press
Black Agenda Report
Buzzflash
Commondreams
Cursor.org
Electronic Iraq
Fabius Maximus
Foreign Policy in Focus
History News Network
Iraq Slogger
Juan Cole's Informed Comment
Lew Rockwell
Open Democracy
PEJ
The Smirking Chimp
Talking Points Memo
TomPaine
TPM Muckraker
Truthdig
Truthout
War in Context
Working for Change
ZNET

Blogs

The American Empire Project
Barbara's Blog
Democrats.com
Dahr Jamail's MidEast Dispatches
Dan Froomkin's White House Watch
Direland
The Dreyfuss Report
Econowhiner
Eric Alterman's Altercation
Firedoglake
Gristmill Blog
Inter Press Service
Lobelog
The Notion at the Nation
Scott Horton's No Comment
This Modern World
A Tiny Revolution
Tony Karon's Rootless Cosmopolitan
The Utne Reader
William Arkin's Early Warning

Foreign

AlArab Online
Agence France Presse
Asia Times
BBC
Foreign Press Review
The Guardian
Haaretz
The Independent
Middle East On-Line
LeMonde Diplomatique
Le Monde Diplomatique (English Language)
Outlook India
Watching America

Magazines

American Prospect
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
Grist
Guernica
LA Weekly
The London Review of Books
Mother Jones
The Nation
The New York Review of Books
Salon.com

Media Criticism

Editor and Publisher
The E&P Pub
FAIR
Media Bloodhound
Media Matters
The News Dissector
Neiman Watchdog
PressThink
Romenesko

Resources

Arms Trade Resource Center
Defense Tech
Global Security.org
Jim Lobe's Interpress Archive
The National Security Archives
Natural Resources Defense Council
Noah Schachtman's Danger Room
Right Web
Secrecy News
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
Wikipedia

Comics

Doonesbury
Life During Wartime
Tom Tomorrow's This Modern World

Polling

Donkey Rising
Pollster.com
ProfessorPollkatz's Pool of Polls
Program on International Policy Attitudes
Real Clear Politics
Zogby

Iraq Casualty Figures

Antiwar.com Casualties Page
Antiwar.com Daily Casualty Update
Iraq Body Count
Iraq Coalition Casualties

Mainstream Media

Christian Science Monitor
Los Angeles Times
Newsweek
New York Times
Washington Post


Tom Engelhardt's articles from around the web


Why the US Military Loves Ron Paul
July 23, 2007, The Nation website

Order 17
September 24, 2007, The Nation website

We Count, They Don't
October 4, 2007, The Nation website

Medal Inflation
October 9, 2007, The Nation website

Tom's Review of Books
December 11, 2007, TomDispatch..